A total of 14 Diesel cars with Auto transmission are available in India. But most are in the lifestyle segment (above 10,00,000) So what options do you really have? Considering the dearth of options we will include those cars which retail at the borderline to lifestyle segment.
1. Hyundai Verna- The cheapest option of the pack is the most expensive option in its lineup. The new generation Accent doesn't have the best of looks and the old Accent which is still on sale looks better. Verna does make up with class leading features but Hyundai has priced its new cars at a premium compared to the competition. 4-speed automatic transmission is old school but still an asset in the current market scenario. I would select Stone black or sleek silver for this car.Automatic is standard and the a/c cools considerable well for the summers. Alloy wheels are standard. Also standard is the much needed foot rest. The audio player is pretty standard and doesnt have the frills of USB or bluetooth like in the Linea. ABS is standard but the car lacks airbags which is a bummer.
Suggestions: Switch to 15-inch alloys with better tyres to aid handling.
Engine 1500cc with 110bhp and 24nm of torque.
ARAI certified mileage- 16.44 kmpl
Ex-showroom Ahmedabad- 922954
2. Mahindra Scorpio- Mahindra is a name in the UV market as strong as Maruti. It has the distinction of being the largest UV maker based on its Bolero platform. With constant efforts to better the product Scorpio has turned out to be a car worth buying. Being a UV it is the only car in this class with a Rear wheel drive chassis. If you thought Verna was fully loaded a simple glance at the feature set here will change your mind. Lets begin with a 2-din Bluetooth enabled car audio with decent speakers to match. With steering mounted controls, USB and SD card capacity this is the most compatible stock car audio in the market right now. Blue vision headlights are an alternative to bi-xenon and look great if not even half as effective. Tyre pressure monitoring system is standard for the automatic. Reverse assist is the most important feature on a car this size. Rain sensing wipers are not useful in India but a luxury worth mentioning neverthless. But Ambient light sensors do work effectively. And now your SUV talks to you which is much sweeter than the buzzing noise in others cars if you leave your door or lights open. Now the question strikes. After all this how can Mahindra provide cruise control at such a great price? I am yet to know. The list goes on with alloy wheels, ABS and Airbags, auto roll down windows, tubeless tyres, illuminated keyring and footboards. phew!!! talk about value for money.
Suggestions: Indian cars are always provided with bad tyres. Upgrade alloy wheels to 17-inch. They look great, fill the tyre wells and work effectively too.
Engine_- 2400cc 120bhp with 290 nm of torque
ARAI certified mileage- 11.79 kmpl
Ex-showroom Ahmedabad- 10,75,5900 (no airbag 2wd version)
3. Chevrolet Cruze- General Motors Cream product and best car to date in India. Cruze sales have eaten into Honda Civic sales big time. With a 150 horses engine Cruze is a hoot to drive. The only car here to have both front and rear disc brakes. 16-inch alloy wheels are standard and do justice to the car. Climate control is standard and so is the telescopic steering wheel. Reverse parking sensors are also standard. Audio is extremely new age with large display and steering mounted controls. I am already in love with push button start since I used it last year. As the name suggests the car comes with cruise control too. rain sensing wipers are not useful but still an addition to value nonetheless. ABS and airbags are standard. The only car here to sport a proper 6-speed transmission.
Suggestions: Bi-xenon projection lamps and rear led lights would've sealed the deal. Make it more round and fly it to Venus.
Engine- 1991 cc 150bhp and 327nm of torque
ARAI certified mileage- 14.4 kmpl
Ex-showroom price- 13,73,928
Results: Get that lazy bum off the chair and buy the Scorpio AT. Cruze is an excellent car though but the price is just a little bit higher compared to whats on offer. It's not GM's fault but just that Mahindra has done a better job at it. If you have the money then Cruze is a close second.
Saturday, 29 May 2010
Wednesday, 26 May 2010
Mahindra&Mahindra buys majority stake in Reva Electric Car Company
Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd (M&M), India’s largest utility vehicle maker, today picked up a 55 per cent stake in REVA Electric Car Company (RECC), the Bangalore-based manufacturer of electric cars, for an undisclosed sum.
This marks M&M’s foray into the alternative fuels technology space.
M&M picked up the stake from the Maini family through a combination of equity purchase and fresh capital infusion of Rs 45 crore.
After today’s development, M&M will hold a 55.2 per cent stake, the co-founder Maini family will hold 31 per cent and 11 per cent will be held by REVA’s co-promoter, Longbell. The balance 2.8 per cent will be distributed to the employees of RECC in the form of stock options.
The authorised capital of REVA would be Rs 135 crore and paid-up capital Rs 20 crore in the new entity.
The buyout makes the Mahindra Group a strong global player in the small but growing electric vehicle segment. Till now, REVA is the single-largest seller of electric vehicles worldwide.
RECC will hence be known as Mahindra REVA Electric Car Company Ltd (RECC) and it will function as a subsidiary of the $6.3-billion Mahindra Group.
RECC Deputy Chairman and Chief Technology Officer Chetan Maini will now become the chief of technology and strategy. His brother, Sandeep, who was chairman till now, will remain as a director on the company’s board.
“It’s the right decision for us to part with the company...the strong brand image and the distribution network of Mahindra will help us to expand the market of REVA. We will leverage their strengths in sourcing parts as well to bring down the cost of the product for the end customer,” said Chetan Maini.
The development has raised speculation that General Motors (GM), which had signed an agreement with RECC last September to jointly develop and manufacture electric vehicles, may consider pulling out of the project.
“We have no problem with GM continuing its association with REVA. It is up to GM to decide on its deal with REVA,” said Pawan Goenka, president (automotive and farm equipment) M&M.
Earlier this year, RECC had bought back stake from both the private equity players, Global Environment Fund and Draper Fisher Jurvetson, who had invested in the company in 2006.
“We are not in a position to disclose the value of shares bought from REVA. This is a strategic acquisition for us in our march towards sustainable mobility solutions. We will benefit from REVA’s electric vehicle (EV) technology for our own products as well. Presently, REVA is the best technology available in the EV space,” Goenka said.
Post the buyout, the board of Mahindra REVA has been reconstituted under the chairmanship of Goenka. The new board includes five nominees from M&M, two from the Maini family — Chetan and Sandeep — and one from California-based AEV LLC, the other co-founder of REVA.
An independent director will be added to the board later.
Rajesh Jejurikar, chief executive (automotive division) and member of the group executive board, M&M, said the company was yet to work out a new brand name for the new entity and logo for the cars that would be sold. However, the names of Mahindra and REVA would appear on the new brand name, he added.
The vehicles will be sold through the vast sales network of the Mahindra Group across the country and overseas markets like Chile, Brazil, Italy, Spain, France and South Africa.
To start with, Mahindra aims to sell REVA models at its select outlets in major metros. The company will expand its sales once the production is ramped up. At present, Mahindra has 170 dealers that sell its SUVs and MUVs range of vehicles.
Over the next five to 10 years, worldwide sales of electric vehicles is expected to touch 1.5 million to 2 million units. By 2020, the country’s electric vehicle market is expected to see a sales of around 80,000-100,000 units per annum and about 50,000 units would come from the Mahindra stable alone, Goenka said.
M&M has been working on developing vehicles using greener fuels and has an electric variant of its three-wheeler commercial vehicle ‘Bijlee’. It is also working on rolling out the electric version of its mini-truck.
REVA, which has a production capacity of 6,000 units per annum, has so far sold over 3,500 vehicles in 24 countries. It is in the process of setting up its second manufacturing unit with an annual capacity of 30,000 units.
source- http://www.business-standard.com/india/news/mm-forays-into-alternative-fuel-techreva-buy/396191/
This marks M&M’s foray into the alternative fuels technology space.
M&M picked up the stake from the Maini family through a combination of equity purchase and fresh capital infusion of Rs 45 crore.
After today’s development, M&M will hold a 55.2 per cent stake, the co-founder Maini family will hold 31 per cent and 11 per cent will be held by REVA’s co-promoter, Longbell. The balance 2.8 per cent will be distributed to the employees of RECC in the form of stock options.
The authorised capital of REVA would be Rs 135 crore and paid-up capital Rs 20 crore in the new entity.
The buyout makes the Mahindra Group a strong global player in the small but growing electric vehicle segment. Till now, REVA is the single-largest seller of electric vehicles worldwide.
RECC will hence be known as Mahindra REVA Electric Car Company Ltd (RECC) and it will function as a subsidiary of the $6.3-billion Mahindra Group.
RECC Deputy Chairman and Chief Technology Officer Chetan Maini will now become the chief of technology and strategy. His brother, Sandeep, who was chairman till now, will remain as a director on the company’s board.
“It’s the right decision for us to part with the company...the strong brand image and the distribution network of Mahindra will help us to expand the market of REVA. We will leverage their strengths in sourcing parts as well to bring down the cost of the product for the end customer,” said Chetan Maini.
The development has raised speculation that General Motors (GM), which had signed an agreement with RECC last September to jointly develop and manufacture electric vehicles, may consider pulling out of the project.
“We have no problem with GM continuing its association with REVA. It is up to GM to decide on its deal with REVA,” said Pawan Goenka, president (automotive and farm equipment) M&M.
Earlier this year, RECC had bought back stake from both the private equity players, Global Environment Fund and Draper Fisher Jurvetson, who had invested in the company in 2006.
“We are not in a position to disclose the value of shares bought from REVA. This is a strategic acquisition for us in our march towards sustainable mobility solutions. We will benefit from REVA’s electric vehicle (EV) technology for our own products as well. Presently, REVA is the best technology available in the EV space,” Goenka said.
Post the buyout, the board of Mahindra REVA has been reconstituted under the chairmanship of Goenka. The new board includes five nominees from M&M, two from the Maini family — Chetan and Sandeep — and one from California-based AEV LLC, the other co-founder of REVA.
An independent director will be added to the board later.
Rajesh Jejurikar, chief executive (automotive division) and member of the group executive board, M&M, said the company was yet to work out a new brand name for the new entity and logo for the cars that would be sold. However, the names of Mahindra and REVA would appear on the new brand name, he added.
The vehicles will be sold through the vast sales network of the Mahindra Group across the country and overseas markets like Chile, Brazil, Italy, Spain, France and South Africa.
To start with, Mahindra aims to sell REVA models at its select outlets in major metros. The company will expand its sales once the production is ramped up. At present, Mahindra has 170 dealers that sell its SUVs and MUVs range of vehicles.
Over the next five to 10 years, worldwide sales of electric vehicles is expected to touch 1.5 million to 2 million units. By 2020, the country’s electric vehicle market is expected to see a sales of around 80,000-100,000 units per annum and about 50,000 units would come from the Mahindra stable alone, Goenka said.
M&M has been working on developing vehicles using greener fuels and has an electric variant of its three-wheeler commercial vehicle ‘Bijlee’. It is also working on rolling out the electric version of its mini-truck.
REVA, which has a production capacity of 6,000 units per annum, has so far sold over 3,500 vehicles in 24 countries. It is in the process of setting up its second manufacturing unit with an annual capacity of 30,000 units.
source- http://www.business-standard.com/india/news/mm-forays-into-alternative-fuel-techreva-buy/396191/
Thursday, 20 May 2010
Riding on success, Fiat goes to step 2
Fiat is alive and kicking sitting on TATA power. From the dwindling 100 Palios sold every month to the 2000 odd cars leaving the showroom Fiat has shown Indians that the word renaissance came from Italy. TATA has also helped improve the After Sales and Spares issues that used to plague Fiat India of old. Now that things have fallen into place Fiat is taking the next step.
Fiat 500 has sold 62 units since launch to date. While many trade pundits has written it as a failure, Its surprising how the 500 has helped Fiat gain brand image while raking in moolah. The 500 fits 4 metre mark in size and the 1500cc engine specification leading to a competitive price. Even with 100% import duty (the car is imported as a CBU from Italy) the car is getting Fiat India a fat margin. Also to be considered is the fact that Fiat has hardly spent Marketing money behind the car and that the engine is the same that goes in Swift, Ritz, Dzire, Linea, Palio Stile, Punto, Indigo Manza and Indica Vista. They can certainly do better than the higher priced Beetle from VW which also has fewer dealers and lesser brand awareness in India as of now.
Fiat Punto Sport is coming soon (2-3 months). The more powerful tune of the same diesel engine will now be putting out 90bhp of power (up 15bhp) and 209 nm of torque (up by 12 nm). Goodies promised are an electric sunroof, matching upholstry, smoked headlamps, 16-inch tyres and a higher price range. Punto will surely sell better than the already dead Honda Jazz at the higher price point looking at the goodies thrown in for 7 lacs.
Fiat and T-jet are almost spoken in one breath most of the times. The magic is coming to India. The linea will boast a 1.4 t-jet diesel churning out 110bhp-120 bhp depending on the state of tune and the turbo charger. Expect a minor interior and exterior facelift including an improvement in those cheap plastic bits that made you delay your purchase.
Fiat 500 has sold 62 units since launch to date. While many trade pundits has written it as a failure, Its surprising how the 500 has helped Fiat gain brand image while raking in moolah. The 500 fits 4 metre mark in size and the 1500cc engine specification leading to a competitive price. Even with 100% import duty (the car is imported as a CBU from Italy) the car is getting Fiat India a fat margin. Also to be considered is the fact that Fiat has hardly spent Marketing money behind the car and that the engine is the same that goes in Swift, Ritz, Dzire, Linea, Palio Stile, Punto, Indigo Manza and Indica Vista. They can certainly do better than the higher priced Beetle from VW which also has fewer dealers and lesser brand awareness in India as of now.
Fiat Punto Sport is coming soon (2-3 months). The more powerful tune of the same diesel engine will now be putting out 90bhp of power (up 15bhp) and 209 nm of torque (up by 12 nm). Goodies promised are an electric sunroof, matching upholstry, smoked headlamps, 16-inch tyres and a higher price range. Punto will surely sell better than the already dead Honda Jazz at the higher price point looking at the goodies thrown in for 7 lacs.
Fiat and T-jet are almost spoken in one breath most of the times. The magic is coming to India. The linea will boast a 1.4 t-jet diesel churning out 110bhp-120 bhp depending on the state of tune and the turbo charger. Expect a minor interior and exterior facelift including an improvement in those cheap plastic bits that made you delay your purchase.
Sunday, 16 May 2010
Reviews on Domestic (Indian) Tyre brands to buy
When I got my car tyres upgraded, the Michelin XM1 cost me a bomb vs. other tires. The tyre inventor company is of French origin and I happily paid the import duty premium back then. But Times have changed. Here are five companies with equivalent quality tyres available in the market. Better bets than buying Chinese brands and risking safety or paying premiums for Yokohama, Bridgestone, Pirelli, Michelin, Toyo, Continental, hankook or Kumho.
1. Apollo: India's largest tyre company and the fastest growing tyre company in the world. Also manufactures Alloy wheels. Holds distinction for acquiring Dunlop SA unit and Netherlands-based Vredestein Banden BV. With the launch of Accelere Sportz and Apollo Aspire Apollo has matched competition with quality and innovation.
2. MRF- The default definition of Tyres in India. Madras Rubber Factory is also one of the most expensive stock on the BSE. MRF also rules the roost ahead of Apollo tyres in the 2010 Indian tyre satisfaction study. Alongwith JK tyres MRF is also one of the leading contributors to the Indian racing circuit. Check out the ZV series of tyres from MRF.
3. JK Tyres: JK tyres have kept pace with MRF on the racing circuit for a long time. And they have used their racing experience in enhancing their tyre quality for the Indian conditions. Check out the JK vectra and Zephyr range for your car.
4. Ceat: Beginning its humble start in Italy, the company changed hands before finally landing into RPG enterprises lap. The company is yet to come with a top of the line tyre competing with the other makes but Its bread and butter tyre sales to car companies for OE fitments has helped CEAT command a good market share. Do check out the Rhino series.
5. Birla Tyres: Birla Group owned Hindustan Motors maybe dying a slow death but the same is not the case with Birla tyres. Check out their Dazzler lineup. Birla tyres have just begun to make inroads and expect a full lineup for all cars in the coming years.
6. TVS tyres: TVS is not only known for making 2-wheelers and pc keyboards. TVS also holds a massive share in the Indian 2-wheeler tyre market.
7. Falcon Tyres: Falcon Tyres started in collobaration with Dunlop tyres is an Indian startup making tyres mostly for the two-wheeler market. Falcon has gained significant market share in a small time frame and is fast becoming a major player.
Alloys wheels: Here are some Alloy wheel makes to beautify your car while aiding in handling and fuel efficiency.
1. Neo Alloys wheels.
2. Aura Alloy (discontinued but some designs are still available)
3. Apollo alloy wheels
1. Apollo: India's largest tyre company and the fastest growing tyre company in the world. Also manufactures Alloy wheels. Holds distinction for acquiring Dunlop SA unit and Netherlands-based Vredestein Banden BV. With the launch of Accelere Sportz and Apollo Aspire Apollo has matched competition with quality and innovation.
2. MRF- The default definition of Tyres in India. Madras Rubber Factory is also one of the most expensive stock on the BSE. MRF also rules the roost ahead of Apollo tyres in the 2010 Indian tyre satisfaction study. Alongwith JK tyres MRF is also one of the leading contributors to the Indian racing circuit. Check out the ZV series of tyres from MRF.
3. JK Tyres: JK tyres have kept pace with MRF on the racing circuit for a long time. And they have used their racing experience in enhancing their tyre quality for the Indian conditions. Check out the JK vectra and Zephyr range for your car.
4. Ceat: Beginning its humble start in Italy, the company changed hands before finally landing into RPG enterprises lap. The company is yet to come with a top of the line tyre competing with the other makes but Its bread and butter tyre sales to car companies for OE fitments has helped CEAT command a good market share. Do check out the Rhino series.
5. Birla Tyres: Birla Group owned Hindustan Motors maybe dying a slow death but the same is not the case with Birla tyres. Check out their Dazzler lineup. Birla tyres have just begun to make inroads and expect a full lineup for all cars in the coming years.
7. Falcon Tyres: Falcon Tyres started in collobaration with Dunlop tyres is an Indian startup making tyres mostly for the two-wheeler market. Falcon has gained significant market share in a small time frame and is fast becoming a major player.
Alloys wheels: Here are some Alloy wheel makes to beautify your car while aiding in handling and fuel efficiency.
1. Neo Alloys wheels.
2. Aura Alloy (discontinued but some designs are still available)
3. Apollo alloy wheels
Saturday, 8 May 2010
CNG and LPG take the game to Petrol and Diesel
Indian government has promoted natural gas and liquified gas as alternatives to polluting gasoline and diesel cars for quite sometime now. In big cities like Delhi and Ahmedabad you can already see Buses, autorickshaws and taxis running on CNG and LPG gas. Here is what a CNG vs. LPG vs. Petrol vs. Diesel war looks like for daily drivers like us?
Why CNG?
1. Rs.24.65 per kg compared to Rs. 51.68 of petrol and Rs. 39.6 for a diesel.
2. Cleaner emissions will help save the planet.
3. Factory kits also demand a higher resale price.
4. Current crop of cars give dual fuel support with petrol as another option.
5. Low maintainence costs.
Why not CNG?
1. improper setup will harm the car. Prefer a company fitted kit.
2. higher initial investment for the car.
3. The tank takes up lots of boot space.
4. The engines are meant for petrol hence power is reduced.
5. Not all the cities have pumps providing gas.
Why LPG?
1. Rs 34.14 per litre compared to Rs. 51.68 of petrol and Rs. 39.6 for a diesel.
2. Cleaner emissions will help save the planet. 3. Factory kit gets you a higher resale price.
4. You get dual fuel option along with petrol.
5. Higher burning capacity.
Why not LPG?
1. Improper setup will harm your car. Prefer a company fitted kit.
2. Higher purchase price.
3. Tank takes up necessary booth space. (smaller than CNG)
4. Compromised power delivery
5. Not all cities have pumps providing gas.
Various car compared with different fuel.
1. Maruti WagonR
WagonR LPG ARAI fuel efficiency- 13.1 kmpl Ex-showroom- 3,50,366
WagonR Petrol ARAI fuel efficiency- 18.9 kmpl Ex-Showroom- 3,38,699
price difference- 11,667
To cover the extra price difference and the lower fuel efficiency you need to drive the car for 92000 kilometers.
pointer- Duo has a tank which fits in the spare tyre bay hence the boot size is not affected.
2. Chevrolet Spark
Chevrolet Spark petrol ARAI fuel efficiency- 17.03 kmpl ex-showroom- 3,17,715
Chevrolet Spark LPG ARAI fuel efficiency- 13.15 kmpl ex-showroom- 354.531
price difference- 36816
To cover the extra premium and lower fuel efficiency on LPG you will have to drive the car for 84000 kilometers.
pointer- The car loses 3bhp when on LPG but retains full 63 horses once you switch to petrol.
3. Hyundai Accent
Hyundai Accent petrol ARAI fuel efficiency- 16.36 kmpl ex-showroom- 5,11,008
Hyundai Accent LPG ARAI fuel efficiency- 11.26 kmpl ex-showroom- 5,47,948
Hyundai Accent CNG fuel efficiency- 14 (estimated) ex-showroom- 5,66,008
price difference- 36940 extra for LPG and 55000 for CNG
To cover the extra cost and lower fuel efficiency figures Accent LPG must be driven for 291000 kms.
To cover the extra cost and lower fuel efficiency figured Accent CNG must be driven for 120000 kms.
Pointer- It makes sense to get a Sequential kit locally than from the company.
4. Hyundai Santro
Hyundai Santro Petrol ARAI fuel efficiency figure- 17.92 kmpl ex-showroom-347901
Hyundai Santro LPG ARAI fuel efficiency figure- 11.88 kmpl ex-showroom- 369824
Hyundai Santro CNG Fuel efficiency figure- 12.8 kmpl ex-showroom- 402901
Price difference- 55,000 for CNG and 21923 for LPG
To compensate for higher price and lower fuel efficiency the Santro CNG must be driven for 58000 kms
To compensate for higher price and lower fuel efficiency the Santro LPG must be driven for XXX kms.
Pointer: Avoid Santro LPG at all costs. Sequential kits sourced locally will be better.
5. Maruti 800
Maruti 800 Petrol ARAI fuel efficiency- 16.1 kmpl ex-showroom- 236020
Maruti 800 LPG ARAI fuel efficiency- 12.7 kmpl ex-showroom- 221113
price difference- 14907
To compensate for higher price and lower fuel efficiency the car must be driven for 29000 kms.
Pointer- Maruti 800 Duo makes sense if you are covering long distances. Really frugal.
Other cars with Gas options
1. Chevrolet Aveo CNG
2. Hindustan Ambassador CNG
3. Hindustan Ambassador LPG
4. Maruti Omni LPG
5. Tata Indica/Indigo LPG
6. Tata Indica/Indigo CNG
7. Toyota Corolla CNG
8. Toyota Innova CNG
Wednesday, 5 May 2010
Hindustan Motors reports to BIFR as predicted
Dating back to my post a month before (http://boyracer.blogspot.com/2010/03/woes-at-hindustan-motors.html ) I had mentioned about the problems at Hindustan Motors. Now the situation has only worsened and HM will be reporting to BIFR (Board if Industrial and Financial Reconstruction) about their current financial status. BIFR is similar to chapter 11 in the US from which General Motors and Chrysler are yet to emerge from since last year. LML is operating under BIFR since the last few years now.
The case for LML is different in that the management and workers have the motivation and capacity to innovate (remember the LML graptor??? I absolutely loved the style and the dials were awesome). But at HM bureaucracy and laggard behaviour has not let them past the 50 year old Ambassador and the 10 year old Lancer. LML is coping well with these days being the largest Scooter exports but what will HM do?
I would suggest getting a small car from AUTOVAZ (Lada) which itself is cash strapped and needs money or Proton of Malaysia which is looking to enter India at a cheap price and entering the volume market. Economies of scale will help in a long way but How serious are the top brass at the CK Birla group about saving HM?
For further reading
http://www.moneycontrol.com/news/business/hindustan-motors-what-led-to-networth-erosion_455837.html
The case for LML is different in that the management and workers have the motivation and capacity to innovate (remember the LML graptor??? I absolutely loved the style and the dials were awesome). But at HM bureaucracy and laggard behaviour has not let them past the 50 year old Ambassador and the 10 year old Lancer. LML is coping well with these days being the largest Scooter exports but what will HM do?
I would suggest getting a small car from AUTOVAZ (Lada) which itself is cash strapped and needs money or Proton of Malaysia which is looking to enter India at a cheap price and entering the volume market. Economies of scale will help in a long way but How serious are the top brass at the CK Birla group about saving HM?
For further reading
http://www.moneycontrol.com/news/business/hindustan-motors-what-led-to-networth-erosion_455837.html
Monday, 3 May 2010
Will Marchionne be able to do a Carlos Ghosn at Fiat- Chrysler?
Four months before Fiat agreed to take management control of Chrysler Group LLC, Chief Executive Officer Sergio Marchionne said he wanted to create one of the world’s top five carmakers.
Speaking to 1,500 people in the auditorium at Fiat’s Turin headquarters on Dec. 11, 2008, Marchionne said Fiat needed to forge alliances with other car companies to survive long term.
It hasn’t gone as planned. While Marchionne scooped up Chrysler, his efforts to acquire General Motor Co.’s Opel, Saab, and South American operations last year went nowhere when GM decided to hang onto them or sell them to someone else.
“Marchionne’s vision was to create a large automotive group under the control of Fiat,” said Giuseppe Berta, a Fiat expert and business professor at Milan’s Bocconi University. “It’s going to be a lot harder now.”
Marchionne’s challenge is to match the success of Carlos Ghosn, who runs an alliance of Renault SA and Nissan Motor Co. as chief executive officer of both companies, said Stephen Pope, chief global equity strategist at Cantor Fitzgerald in London. Ghosn’s 11-year-old Renault-Nissan partnership is the only major auto alliance that has worked, Pope said.
Keeping up with Ghosn could become harder for Marchionne in the wake of Renault-Nissan’s agreement in early April to share small-car and engine technology with Daimler AG.
Latest Vision
At a press conference in Turin on April 21, Marchionne laid out his latest vision for the Fiat-Chrysler alliance. By integrating the two companies’ product development and distribution and linking up with partners in Russia and China, he said, his enterprise would produce 6 million cars by 2014. Right now, Fiat and Chrysler can make about 3.3 million cars. Marchionne would have to add 2.7 million units.
“When we announced our acquisition of Chrysler, our objective was clear,” said Marchionne, who also outlined plans to split Fiat’s industrial operations from carmaking. “We wanted the international benefit of access to the NAFTA region. We were looking for an industrial partner with which to shore up Fiat’s business.”
While Chrysler reported a $143 million operating profit for the first three months of 2009, analysts say those results could be fleeting.
“The accounting remains opaque, and current costs may not be sustainable,” said Max Warburton, a senior analyst at Bernstein Research in London, who in an April 15 report predicted Chrysler would report a first-quarter profit.
Falling Share
Between March 2009 and March 2010, Chrysler’s U.S. market share fell 2 percentage points to 9.2 percent, according to Autodata Corp. in Woodcliff Lake, New Jersey. Over the same period Ford Motor Co.’s share surged to 17.4 percent from 14.7 percent, and GM’s rose to 18.7 percent from 18.6 percent. Independent analyst Maryann Keller said Marchionne, 57, could miss his sales target of 1.1 million cars in the U.S. this year.
Ghosn, 56, set the modern standard for automotive turnarounds, leading Nissan to record profits of $3.6 billion on $66 billion in revenue 17 months after his arrival.
“The lead success story in auto industry alliances is Renault-Nissan,” said Cantor Fitzgerald’s Pope. “He’s defied the odds. The Renault-Nissan alliance has become the benchmark.”
In the early going, Ghosn earned respect inside and outside the auto industry by setting short-term targets and vowing to resign if he didn’t meet them.
On Oct. 18, 1999, Ghosn announced the Nissan Revival Plan and vowed to be profitable by March 2001, to boost operating margins to 4.5 percent and cut debt in half by March 2003. Ghosn hit the last two targets one year ahead of schedule.
Rough Going
By contrast, Marchionne’s vision for Chrysler as the linchpin of a new global auto alliance hit rough going almost immediately after he announced it.
Last May, seeking global scale, Marchionne expressed interest in acquiring GM’s European and South American assets. GM never formally offered to sell its South American operations, which included production and sales in Brazil and Argentina. The U.S. automaker declined Fiat’s offer for Opel and decided to sell the division to Magna, the Canadian auto parts maker.
Then, last November, GM changed course. Overruling Fritz Henderson, who was CEO at the time, the board decided to hang on to Opel. The directors argued keeping the division would help GM maintain a strong presence in Europe.
Marchionne wound up with only Chrysler. Fiat obtained a 20 percent stake in exchange for technology and export opportunities. The United Auto Workers’ retiree health-care fund owns 67.7 percent, with the U.S. and Canadian governments holding the rest.
Too Early
Marchionne’s defenders say it’s too early to rate his performance because he has been running Chrysler for about 10 months. Stefano Aversa, co-president, AlixPartners LLP, which advised Fiat on a joint venture with GM, said Marchionne’s efforts won’t become visible until the end of the year when Chrysler will have released new versions of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, the Chrysler 300 sedan and started plugging holes in the model lineup.
“He doesn’t have a magic wand,” said Aversa. “It’s premature to judge now.”
Marchionne faces a weak car market; auto sales were booming in the U.S. when Ghosn launched his turnaround at Nissan. The international auto market is also more competitive than it was 11 years ago because car companies can produce 90 million vehicles worldwide, about 30 million more than there are buyers.
Gutted Budgets
Chrysler is weaker than Nissan was when Ghosn arrived in 1999, said John Wolkonowicz, senior auto analyst at IHS Global Insight. Bent on cutting costs, Chrysler’s previous owner, Cerberus Capital Management LP, gutted the budgets for new vehicles. When Marchionne took over last June, Chrysler had few models in the development pipeline and no small, fuel-efficient cars. While Fiat’s 500 compact is scheduled to go on sale in Chrysler showrooms in December, new vehicles, about half to be built from Fiat designs, won’t appear until 2012.
“Nissan was nowhere near as sick as Chrysler,” Wolkonowicz said.
Though Nissan was headed for its seventh annual loss in eight years when Ghosn took over, the company had a lineup of new models on which to build. What’s more, Renault, in taking a 36.8 percent stake in Nissan, injected $5.4 billion into the Japanese automaker.
“The table was set in many respects when Ghosn came on board,” said Michael Robinet, a senior analyst for CSM Worldwide Inc. in Troy, Michigan.
Cultural Challenge
Ghosn’s challenge at Nissan was partly cultural. He was the first Westerner to run a major Japanese automaker. Seeking to fit in, he learned conversational Japanese, ate $4 bowls of ramen noodles in the Nissan cafeteria and rode the same elevator as regular employees.
Learning Japanese helped Ghosn win credibility with executives and workers accustomed to lifetime employment, said labor boss Akira Takakura, as Ghosn set about restructuring Nissan. By March of 2003, Ghosn, dubbed “Le Cost-Killer” by the French media for his previous efforts at Renault, had closed five factories, and laid off 21,000 employees, or 14 percent of the workforce.
Renault shares are down 1.4 percent since the beginning of the year while Fiat shares are flat. Out of 34 analysts rating the French carmaker’s stock tracked by Bloomberg, 12 have a “buy” rating, while nine advise holding the shares and five recommend selling it. Of 34 analysts following Fiat and monitored by Bloomberg, 12 advise buying the shares, 12 suggest holding them and 10 recommend selling. Chrysler is closely held.
‘Overweight’
Adam Jonas, Morgan Stanley’s lead European automotive analyst and the No. 1 rated analyst under “Bloomberg’s Absolute Return Ranking,” ranks Fiat as “overweight.” In an April 22 note, Jonas said Chrysler would help Fiat compete.
“Herein lies one of the biggest buckets of value currently ignored by the market,” Jonas wrote.
Cantor Fitzgerald’s Pope has a “sell” recommendation on Fiat shares. He said the Fiat brand had limited global potential, especially in China.
Marchionne was born in Chieti, Italy, and moved to Toronto when he was 14. He holds dual Canadian and Italian citizenship and is as much at ease unveiling new Fiat models for Italian dignitaries as he is grabbing junk food with United Auto Workers’ Vice President General Holiefield.
A chartered accountant, barrister, and solicitor, Marchionne began his career in Canada, where he worked as an accountant and tax specialist for Deloitte & Touche. In 1994 Marchionne joined chemicals and pharmaceuticals group Alusuisse Lonza Group Ltd. Three years later, as CEO, he spun off the pharmaceuticals business to create Lonza Group AG, where he tripled profit in three years.
Turnaround Artist
Marchionne consolidated his reputation as a turnaround artist at SGS SA, the Geneva-based product testing company, and Fiat, which he joined as CEO in 2004. He returned Fiat to profit in 2005 after four years of losses by wringing about $2 billion out of GM to unravel an alliance between the two, laying off 19,000 workers, slashing product development times to 18 months from four years and introducing new models such as the Punto.
While analysts say Marchionne continues to find ways to cut costs at Chrysler, much of that work was done when he arrived in Detroit. The 6-week trip through Chapter 11 last spring, which Marchionne called a “washing machine” bankruptcy, left Chrysler a leaner entity. Chrysler shed 8 factories, real estate, equipment leases and 789 U.S. dealerships.
Improving Morale
Marchionne gets credit inside and outside Chrysler for improving morale, laid low after a revolving door of owners, including Daimler, which sold the company to Cerberus in 2007.
“After 10 years of tyranny between Daimler and Cerberus, the creativity at Chrysler had been pushed very far underground,” said IHS Global Insight’s Wolkonowicz. “Now Marchionne is bringing it out and he will put his mark on it.”
One of Marchionne’s first acts was to reach into the ranks and promote 40-something managers to prominent positions. That’s what he did at Fiat.
“I look for people who have two fundamental abilities--to embrace change and to lead people,” Marchionne, who declined to be interviewed for this story, said during a March 30 speech in New York.
Last October Marchionne named Ralph Gilles, 40, chief of the Dodge brand, a job that entails deciding what kind of cars to build and how to market them. Before Marchionne arrived, said Gilles, department heads made presentations to the executive committee and left once the senior staff began discussing the pros and cons. Now, Gilles said, he and other department chiefs are expected to join the debate.
“All the people that need to make something happen are in the room,” he said.
Linchpin Model
Morale is one thing; new product another. With little to show, Marchionne is pouring resources into a new version of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which is scheduled to go on sale at U.S. dealerships in June. He has called the sport utility vehicle a linchpin model that could spur sales and cast a halo over the entire company.
“It is the signature car for Chrysler,” he said March 30. “This needs to be the badge for all new models that will get introduced.”
Marchionne has said the new Grand Cherokee must be flawless and of much higher quality than its predecessors. Making the SUV a success falls to Mike Manley, 46, president and CEO of Jeep.
“It’s the first vehicle out of the gate,” Manley said. “I feel a huge amount of pressure to get this right.”
Analysts say that while the new Jeep may help Marchionne boost sales in the short term, the gaps in the product lineup will be difficult to solve.
‘Dubious’
“We remain dubious that Fiat can deliver great new Chrysler product,” Bernstein analyst Warburton wrote in an April 15 report. “For 2010/11 all the company has, apart from the new Grand Cherokee, is some refreshes and facelifts.”
Since becoming Chrysler’s CEO, Marchionne said on March 30, he has been working seven days a week and shuttling between Turin, where Fiat is based, and Michigan.
“You can’t do this forever,” Marchionne said, adding that reviving a car company after a trip through bankruptcy requires relentless focus.
While IHS Global Insight’s Wolkonowicz acknowledges Marchionne has a “very tough assignment,” he said the man who turned around Fiat also could revive Chrysler.
“I think he’s doing everything humanly possible,” said Wolkonowicz. “He’s 2 people in 1. He gets all of it.”
Ultimately, said Cantor Fitzgerald’s Pope, Marchionne will be measured against Ghosn, who declined to be interviewed about a competitor. While sales at Renault-Nissan have suffered in the economic slump, analysts continue to praise the alliance’s architect.
“He’s got a world-class ability to handle two big companies,” said Yoshihiro Okumura, who helps oversee the equivalent of $365 million at Chiba-gin Asset Management Co. in Tokyo. “I’m not sure if there are others who can follow him.”
When asked about Ghosn, Marchionne called himself “just a metal basher,” and said: “He’s much better than I am.”
Sunday, 2 May 2010
The best e-scooters in India.
The models mentioned below are in the higher cost bracket due to the long lasting and more powerful battery installed, better build quality and additional features.
2. Yo EXL ER (My pick): The YO EXL ER has the quickest charging times of all e-scooters in the market. The scooter also boasts of a 1800 watts peak power compared to 1500 watts peak power from competing scooters. The scooter weights 130kgs and has a standard range of 65kms. And it Saves the environment, Light on the pocket and gives full torque from the 0 rpm. Fun to drive.
1. Hero E-sprint (My choice): Comes with a cellphone charger. Front disc brake is an added bonus. 65 kms range good enough for city driving. The E-sprint is heavier at 140 kilograms but helps in better control of the vehicle. 10 inch alloy wheels make it a good buy.Saves the environment, Light on the pocket and gives full torque from the 0 rpm. Fun to drive.
Conclusion: Priced 35000 ex-showroom. Electric scooters have grown fast to compete with petrol scooters. With big companies like Hero Motors jumping in the market, be assured its the investment worth going for.
2. Yo EXL ER (My pick): The YO EXL ER has the quickest charging times of all e-scooters in the market. The scooter also boasts of a 1800 watts peak power compared to 1500 watts peak power from competing scooters. The scooter weights 130kgs and has a standard range of 65kms. And it Saves the environment, Light on the pocket and gives full torque from the 0 rpm. Fun to drive.
http://yobykes.in
Conclusion: A well known name in electric scooters. Build quality is not as great at Hero's product. But a good product nonetheless.
3. EKO EV60: An ARAI approved scooter that's ready to take the crown from Petrol scooters. With an 1878 watts battery, a front disc brake, Alloy wheels and a true 65km range, this is one scooter worth looking at. Regenerative braking is supposedly first on this model. http://www.ekovehicle.com/index.asp?file=products Conclusion: Avalability can be an issue. Not as well built as Hero Motors. E-commuting era has come.
4. TVS Scooty teenz: TVS motors along with Hero Motors is has given e-bikes an opportunity to survive. Also TVS motors has rightly taken the scooty name to popularize electricity as an alternate fuel. The scooty teenz still looks small for Men but the dimensions are perfect for the girls. A battery with 800 watts of power stands strong against competition. A mobile charger keeps your gadgets ready for action. At 95kg its pretty lightweight to keep things fun. at 40kms the range is limiting. http://www.scootygals.com/ Conclusion: A half hearted effort, but an effort still. TVS needs to take the next step and bring us the electric Wego.
others options to check out BSA Roamer NUO
tara s66d
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)